<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://78.47.123.87/taxonomy/term/603/all" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:fb="http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:sioc="http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" xmlns:sioct="http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#">
  <channel>
    <title>livecoding</title>
    <link>http://78.47.123.87/taxonomy/term/603/all</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
     <atom:link href="http://78.47.123.87/taxonomy/term/603/all/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
      <item>
    <title>ONE LOVE: How FLOSS Can Make True All the Promises of the Avantgarde (yet would kill &#039;art&#039; by doing so)</title>
    <link>http://78.47.123.87/node/551</link>
    <description>&lt;section class=&quot;field field-name-field-topic field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-inline clearfix view-mode-teaser&quot;&gt;&lt;h2 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Topic:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/taxonomy/term/407&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;FLOSS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/taxonomy/term/87&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;art&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/taxonomy/term/743&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;Open Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/taxonomy/term/603&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;livecoding&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/taxonomy/term/115&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;avantgarde&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/taxonomy/term/761&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;participation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/section&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-teaser&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot; property=&quot;content:encoded&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;In his essay &lt;i&gt;All problems of Notation Will be Solved by the Masses&lt;/i&gt;, Simon Yuill claims that the emergent practice of livecoding  &#039;most directly embodies the key principles of FLOSS production into the creation and experience of the work itself.&#039; Unfortunately this claim is supportet by an argumentation which is elitist, draws on the criterium of virtuosity and thereby stands in stark contrast to the culture of particpation that FLOSS has engendered. While his central argument is not supported, the piece offers enough food for thought to be considered interesting reading. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Armin Medosch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">551 at http://78.47.123.87</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
